On the Concept of Lawyer's Club - Finding a good lawyer can really be a difficult task for some. I have seen many processes that go wrong simply due to a lack of effective communication between the client and his lawyer. With due respect to the noble profession, most professional professionals are busy as hell, and do not even have time to pay attention to what the client may actually be talking about. Most lawyers play a double role as a lawyer and advocate at the same time. Doing justice to each client's complaints and specific demands for redress is often impossible for the legal professional who would prefer to reformulate the main issue into a preconceived structure that may or may not suit the actual case. Such a preconception can often spoil the merit of the case.
There is already a clear division between lawyers who practice civil proceedings and those who appear in the trials of criminals, suspects and convicts. It is not surprising that, in the courts of first instance, the lawyers who deal with criminal actions really think about the paradigm of criminals. Since most of them do not have any professional expertise in the psychology of crime and related disciplines, because of their own profession, they often want to put themselves in the place of the criminal or the suspect, in order to reach the harsh reality. , or even to find the right alibi when defending. Within a framework where the judicial process is slow to say the least, there is every possibility that another game of a different motive and of different merit will intervene while the lawyer himself is busy becoming the victim or the perpetrator of crime in the first case the hand. In such a situation, our educated friend would normally try either of the two things: either he might want to slow down the second process a bit so that he had enough time to get out of the first, or judge the second in the perspective of the first. Eventually, both are on the wrong side. However, if someone pursues an investigation into the pattern of how time passes until the beginning of the processes, you will find enough data to support the previous vision, even more so in countries like India, where the judiciary is slow enough. In no country in the world, the crime rate would never be equal to the rate of disposition of processes by the judiciary, not even in the United States. The lawyers have a hectic life.
Here comes the concept of floating agent as the club of lawyers. Personally, I am a member of one of these online clubs for some years, and I must say that the concept works to a certain extent, although the concept is practicable in view of the true persuasion of the facts, it is still a matter of debate. The basic concept is to have an open forum of defenders from various fields of specialization; let's say an open market of opinions, instead of a small camera near the defender or a law firm, where a limited number of opinions is available at any time. The client, whether the author or not, can present his case openly before the panel, hiding the real identity, if necessary, to maintain privacy, and the agora of the educated professionals is free to write their opinions, suggestions, recommendations , etc. If the client finds one of the realistic answers or even closer to their hearts, they can continue the discussion with the lawyer or the lawyer on a personal level. This conversation can lead to a real presentation before a court with appropriate jurisdiction.
However, two real problems are there. First, the client needs to be smart enough to find and judge the appropriate response from the host of various opinions, which in most cases do not work for the client, if the victim herself often fails to see the reason and reason; two, often a problem of jurisdiction arises, the lawyer who gave the correct answer may not be authorized to proceed in the jurisdiction where the actual incident occurred. A wider network of professionals is needed to solve these problems.